The following survey tools were developed as part of the evaluation framework: In turn, the draft surveys were pre-tested with a convenience sample of physicians. Two focus groups have also been conducted in British Columbia with physicians to collect physicianįeedback on the COMPUS printed educational materials on PPIs. Presentations at continuing education sessions were assessed using several different methods. Lessons and evidence from existing literature on evaluation of continuing education andĮducational outreach to health professionals were elicitedĭraft PPIs intervention tools such as physician and patient materials and slides for To assist in development of the evaluation framework, a number of activities were undertaken:Ī sample of educational providers were surveyed to collect input on current practices inĬontinuing education and evaluation, challenges or barriers to effective evaluation, and As part of the framework, selected qualitative survey tools wereĭeveloped that can be used or adapted as part of evaluation of the educational interventions.
Undertaken by educational providers, their sponsors, or COMPUS to evaluate the effectiveness of This document sets out options for qualitative and quantitative evaluation that could be These evidence-based intervention tools on PPIs will be available for use to educational providersĪcross the country, such as academic detailing services, continuing education programs, or health Patient education materials (alternative prescription pad as above) andĪcademic detailing materials (newsletter, training or “upskilling” document). Physician and pharmacist educational presentations (didactic and interactive) Printed educational materials (newsletter, prescribing aid, alternate prescription pad, self-audit
Automate programabile curs professional#
The following tools are being developed in collaboration with experts in continuing professional The Canadian Optimal Medication Prescribing and Utilization Service (COMPUS) is producing aĬollection of intervention tools to disseminate its key messages on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). 77Įvaluation Framework for COMPUS Intervention Tools on Proton Pump Inhibitors ii Post-intervention: Evaluation options and recommendations. Formative evaluation: Choice of dissemination channels, methods, and tools. Environmental scan: Local context and capacity. 22ĪPPENDIX III: EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR COMPUS MATERIALS ON PPIS: CASE STUDY INīRITISH COLUMBIA.66Ī. POST “POST-INTERVENTION”: FEEDING RESULTS OF EVALUATIONS INTO THE NEXT WAVE OF POST-INTERVENTION: EVALUATION OPTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PPI Formative evaluation: Choice of dissemination channels, methods, and tools.11 Quantitative evaluation: Strategies for impact evaluation using administrativeĭatabases.5 Made possible through funding from Health Canada.Ĭanadian Optimal Medication Prescribing and Utilization ServiceĮvaluation Framework for COMPUS Intervention ToolsĮvaluation Framework for COMPUS Intervention Tools on Proton Pump Inhibitors iĮXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Or any Provincial or Territorial Government.
The statements, conclusions and views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the view of Health Canada The information in this document is not a substitute for clinical judgement in the care of a particular patient.ĬADTH is not liable for any damages arising from the use or misuse of any information contained in or implied by
Intervention Tools on Proton Pump Inhibitors
0 kommentar(er)
